locusmeus

text

Archive for January, 2006

Geocaching and GPS devices

Monday, January 23rd, 2006

Last Saturday we had a church outing, which included an afternoon walk through the woods. It wasn’t just your ordinary regular walk though; it was an actual geocaching trip.

One of the GPS devices we used for the geocaching trip

We were split in 10 groups, each with one of these GPS devices, and a piece of paper with the first set of coordinates written on them. Before we left, leaders of each group received an explanation on how to use the device, and then the groups were sent on their way, a couple of minutes apart.

Not everybody picked up the information that fast though, so when our group’s leader kept looking puzzled on receiving the information, I asked if I could help…

The instruction was short and simple: “this is where and how you enter the coordinates, and then you follow that arrow”. Well, up till we found the first location, this worked very well, and I thought it would be a breeze.

The purpose was to find a box on each location, in which there’d be a piece of paper with a multiple choice question. Each possible answer was linked to a set of GPS coordinates, so it was important to get the question answered correctly, in order to end up in the right spot for the next box.

The first question was easy too, and I entered the new coordinates into the GPS device. The route went North East, about 2 kilometers. We didn’t have a map, so we just had to find whichever path we thought would get us closest to the spot, and when we were only 200 meters from the second destination, we saw the box. Or so we thought.

When arriving at the box, the device still said North East, 140 meters. Obviously, that wasn’t our box. Soon another group arrived, and indeed, it was their box. So, I reckoned we should go another 140 meter North East, but that would be right across the river. As the river seemed to run from East to West, we started walking East, thinking we’d cross a bridge, walk back West, and find our box on the other side. As we walked, the arrow kept pointing North East, but the distance got greater with every step. Something seemed wrong, but I thought it was because the box was on the other side of the river.

Long story short: we walked 1 km to the first bridge, crossed it, walked 1 km in the opposite direction, only to find out that our box was indeed 140 meters from the other group’s box, but on the same river bank, in Western direction. Somehow, this GPS device didn’t do what it should have done: turn the arrow arround when we started walking in the wrong direction. I’m still not sure if that’s really what should have happened though, as there was another indication of direction on the device, that hadn’t been explained to me: the arrow was ‘broken’. The middle bit of it moves sideways when you’re off the right track. Had I known what this broken arrow meant, we would probably have found the second box much quicker :-)

Anyway, looking at our box from the wrong side of the river, knowing it would be another 2km extra to get there and having tired children with us (mine) and a couple more tired people (not me), we decided to forget that second box and just go straight for the third (and final) one. We called the ‘cop out phone number’ and got the coords for the third box. GPS device said “South West, 2km”. Right across the river again. One of the brighter people among us decided to ask a passing cyclist whether the bridge in the Western direction would be closer than the one we just came from, and while it appeared to be the same distance, it would bring us closer to the third box than the other bridge, so we kept on walking West.

After we crossed that bridge, the device was pointing in the right direction, the road was straight, and all went fine. Until we got to 500 meters from the third box’ location: the lake. A big lake between us and the last box. The same lake also between us and the dinner that would be served after the walk. In the mean time it had gotten dark already, and some of us weren’t quite comfortable walking through the woods in the dark.

In the end we walked a couple hundred meters alongside the lake, until basically through miscommunication (too long a story to write down), we had to walk back to the road where we got picked up by a van, only to get back just in time for the leftovers from dinner — we were over an hour late!

Conclusion on geocaching: a fun thing to do, once you understand what the display on the GPS device really is saying ;-)

Party!

Wednesday, January 11th, 2006

Today was the first time I ever organized a birthday party of the ‘kids only’ type, but despite my lack of experience it all went pretty well. The kids enjoyed themselves, the hamster survived, and I have a headache. I reckon that’s called a successful party, right? ;-)

I did prepare a bunch of typical birthday games, but we only got round to playing five of them, because the boys just wanted to play all the new (to them) computergames. With only two screens in the room, and seven boys, everybody had to wait for their turn, but somehow nobody complained.

The best liked birthday game appeared to be ‘bomb-sweets’: put a bunch of different sweets on the table, send one kid to the corridor, and let the rest of the kids decide which sweet is the bomb. Once decided, the ‘victim’ is called back into the room, and may pick up sweets from the table, one by one. Until he picks up the ‘bomb’, and everybody shouts “BOOM!!”. That’s when he has to stop picking up sweets, and it’s the next person’s turn to go to the corridor. I guess 6 and 7 year olds just like the suspense: is he gonna pick the bomb next?

Here’s the happy bunch:

seven boys, four hours...

From left to right: Tiago, Hendsley, Felix, Delano, Alborz, Kevin and Gabriël

Can you spot the one whose mother is in the room, waiting for him to put on his shoes and go home? In this next pic the others tickle him to get him to smile…

Delano is ticklish

Tickling always works :-)

All in all it was a great afternoon, but I’m going to bed early today! :-)

Hamster

Wednesday, January 11th, 2006

Since a couple of months Gabriël had been asking me to get him a hamster for his birthday, and I told him he could only have one if he’d keep his room tidy. He had to keep it tidy all the way till his birthday to prove he could do it, cause hamsters make enough mess by themselves. Apparently he wanted this hamster bad enough, cause he actually managed to keep his room tidy most of the time for the past three months.

Although his birthday is on Xmas day, we always celebrate it in the last weekend of the holiday, to not force relatives to choose between birthday cake and Xmas dinner, and to avoid clashing decorations in the house.

So.. last Sunday we did the birthday thing, and one of his gifts looked quite large, and out came a hamster cage. Even before it was properly unwrapped, Gabriël complained there wasn’t any hamster in it — as if I’d wrap a live animal in giftwrap and leave it in the closet overnight :-)

Yesterday we went to the store to let him pick one, and this is the one he chose:

It’s not just any hamster…

It’s a “Campbell’s Russian Dwarf Hamster”!

I wouldn’t have known that name — they’re all ‘dwarf hamsters’ to me, but looking at the colouring and comparing with pictures on this site about hamsters, I’m quite sure it’s a Campbell’s Russian one. A quote from that site: “The temperaments of individual Campbell’s hamsters vary, but they are usually outgoing and friendly if handled confidently.” So far so good :-)

Happy New Year!

Sunday, January 1st, 2006
Gabriƫl